| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
   |
Posted - 2008.06.04 21:20:00 -
[1]
o/ INSRG
ignore the silly alt, we all know who failed and it wasnt Insurgency
Just out of interest, who's getting kicked? Or should i convo someone and keep it out of COAD 
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 16:53:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Ethan Hunte
as a side joke, darth solo leaving was the only condition bob would accept insurgency under, so he threw himself on the sword for the sake of his alliance.
Is this true or just COAD rumour? He had a, well, if not good, then functional relationship with BoB leadership when I was in INSRG and he led it.
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 21:59:00 -
[3]
Whats the problem with my posts, Iteken?
Love ya 
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 11:00:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Lilan Kahn
Originally by: Aaron Mirrorsaver
Edited by: Aaron Mirrorsaver on 05/06/2008 23:39:10
must have had c.rack c.ocaine in that bbq.
because after c4 has said to most of the corps (unknown to them) you merge or leave. now ceos of the chosen corps remaining (friends of c4) are eve mailing individual members of my corp telling them to join them... so you dont want the corp you want the members.
i have an idea you pay 100bil isk for each member you want and i sell em to you.
i see insurgency is back at the same old keeping every one in the dark 
Well one of the main reasons WEDIE couldnt work with C4 was his crippling paranoia, which I put down to copious amounts of a certain recently reclassified drug.
Despite the fact INSRG covered multiple timezones, he refused to discuss anything on even the most secure of forums, was convinced people were listening to every conversation, and would give no information to help people run their corps effectively in terms of managing member expectations, etc.... it honestly was like working with someone with paranoid psychosis. Completely untenable.
Nice enough chap, nothing against him personally, but just impossible to constructively work with on a sane, level basis.
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 19:54:00 -
[5]
It is heartwarming to see you showing off your communication skills on a public forum, C4. You act with all the respect, gravitas, and decorum one would expect from the leader of a 'great' alliance. Very well done to you.
Truly, we made the wrong decision leaving INSRG under your esteemed leadership, as all can see.
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 20:01:00 -
[6]
Lilan, the man is a lost cause, forget it.
He is so crippled by paranoia he actually believes his delusions to be true, so you cannot rationalise with him.
Paranoia on that level isn't healthy, it is a symptom of mental illness. But telling someone with paranoid psychosis that they are being irrational is basically pointless, since they believe their paranoid ramblings to be true. Very sad.
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 22:11:00 -
[7]
Originally by: C4w3
You are aware this is a game right? personal attacks makes you look like the failure you are ...... sad man sad.
No personal attack intended C4. Unfortunately when it comes to the individual leading an alliance, things do tend to get a little personal since the entire reason WEDIE left INSRG was because none of us could stand you. If thats a personal attack, so be it. It is also a statement of fact 
Our corp liked Darth a lot. We can't say the same for you. Sorry, as you say I'm a failure anyway and its not like anyone liked us in INSRG, we contributed nothing
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 22:21:00 -
[8]
What don't you understand about the sentence "we left INSRG because you were appointed leader" ?
Our corp was a consistently top performer, we fielded the most number of capitals of any corp consistently, we ran deathstars, jump-bridges, the pet scheme, and logistics. To suggest we were anything other than an excellent contributer means you are a deluded liar driven by nothing more than personal likes and dislikes. Which incidentally I believe to be the case.
Our leaving INSRG was nothing to do with INSRG, and everything to do with you. Just you.
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.06 22:26:00 -
[9]
Since when was 2 weeks 3 months?
I can't even understand the rest of your post, to be honest. Try actually making a point, or something.
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 13:56:00 -
[10]
Originally by: chris lares
im going to be honest and nice about this.
You contributed to the caps but nothing else really and you put a few pos's up nothing more guys. The closest other thing u contributed too was leading your corp ops which had nothing to do with the rest of the alliance so in my head and in others in INSRG u didnt do enough. Its not a personel vendetta against WEDIE. I personally liked some of you alot.
Facts don't back this up I'm afraid.
We consistently scored the most kills on a per member basis (ie, we were the best performing corp for our size) during the whole time we were in INSRG. We're still 4th on the killboard out of 30-odd corps, some much larger, and only corps at least double our size are ahead of us. We're efficient and bloody good at whatever we choose to do.
We redefined the way INSRG fought fleet combat, moving to a maximum damage and range doctrine and I personally provided all the cookie cutter setups and forced people to use them. That was driven by us against a lot of opposition at the time. The victories we saw in 304 were the direct result of that doctrine.
We contributed more deathstar POS and jump bridge POS on a per member basis than ANY other corp in Insurgency, again, this means that we were the best corp in the alliance who contributed the most for our size.
The only 'corp ops' we ran were in small roaming nano-logistic gangs and these happened very rarely and never happened during campaigns. The reason we ran these is because INSRG generally can't run a roaming gang to save its life and the killboard is all the proof you need of that.
In short, we were one of the few corps who have everything we could to the alliance. We tolerated the leeches and bandwaggoners who came in on the coat tails of the 304 campaign because we enjoyed being there. We got on with the job.
We don't have a problem with Insurgency, its the paranoid dictator known as C4 we had the problem with. We would have never joined the alliance had he been leader, and whilst we tolerated him as a fellow corp CEO, we made it clear we would leave if he became leader. And as you can see, that wasn't a bluff. We stayed true to our word, as we always have done.
----------
|
Butter Dog
The Littlest Hobos
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 14:01:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Aaron Mirrorsaver
then there is c4, he doesnt have any leadership qualities, what are they? google leadership qualities.
Precisely.
----------
|
| |
|